When a mutation changes the enzyme, the prediction should change too.
Mutation-sensitive predictions of enzyme kinetic regimes, built around protein sequence, substrate chemistry, and curated evidence. CatRange (PNAS Nexus, 2026) and its precursor framework RealKcat (bioRxiv, 2025) together form this line of work.
→ Variant
→ Context
Regimes, not false precision.
Conceptual Schematic · Not Experimental Output
The Question
An enzyme can look almost identical in sequence and behave very differently after a catalytic-site mutation. How can a model reflect that difference without implying more numerical precision than the evidence supports?
My Contribution
I developed CatRange with collaborators, connecting biochemical data curation, enzyme–substrate representations, model development, evaluation, and usable inference.
- Protein representations
- Substrate chemistry
- Gradient-boosted classification
- Mutation-aware evaluation
- Research inference
What the record shows
The PNAS Nexus publication and public repository provide the research and software record. The contribution is a range-based, mutation-sensitive modeling framework—not an experimental measurement of every predicted variant.
What this does—and does not—establish
A predicted regime is not a measured kinetic constant. Neighboring-bin recovery is an evaluation criterion, not automatically a calibrated confidence interval. Assay context, sequence coverage, and the deployed bin definitions still matter.